The petitioner sought the cancellation of a young for installing drinking water provide on lands allegedly belonging to him and his forefathers. The courtroom emphasised the necessity for that petitioner to acquire locus standi being an “aggrieved person” in constitutional jurisdiction circumstances. Consequently, the Court upheld the judgments and decrees https://johnathanpgvox.blogkoo.com/5-simple-statements-about-best-damages-advocate-in-karachi-explained-49375672